Paranoid thugs trapped in the language of the past

  • Daniel Fritschler (Replying to the prior blog post) Isn’t it true though as long as I am a puppet to the media then I am just a character in their play. There is no personal power if others, whoever it may be, are telling me when to lay down, when to roll over and how to play dead. Everything you said in this article is common sense right? But for the ones who don’t know or aren’t aware that they are being lead around by their nostrils. 

    So my point here is that so many simply perceive the language of hearsay as important, when in actuality the language that is used is only done to control perception. So knowing this why is it JR that more don’t look at the purpose behind or of the language itself and simply speak to the words or concepts being shared? Why do so many not speak to the purpose or intent of the message or even consider it? It is as if they allow their perception to be hijacked momentarily or permanantly instead of saying well he is only saying that to make me think about ______?

  • Daniel Fritschler I understand that the job of a government is to govern and then the job of corporations is to make money and then the job of media is to promote the governing and the corporations that are the bosses of the ones controlling perception, as I said common sense. What I have troubles understanding is everybody knows this, or has access to this information, so why then would I or anybody else take all of the hearsay that is said to be my ruler and worship this language as if it is meaningful or even has any truth to it? Beyond intended control of course?
  • J R Fibonacci Hunn Daniel Fritschler, we cannot be free of cultural conditioning any more than we can be free of DNA or free of our spine. The bait of spirituality may include the very attractive ideal (to those who are ashamed) that they can free themselves of their past. That is false. However, we can notice the practice of pretending that the past is not just the past (which tends to keep it present). Or, we can witness the momentum of that activity dissolving or relaxing in the “light” of attention or mindfulness. 

    Also, it is totally valid to “pretend that the past is not the past.” After all, the only time that consciousness can take action through the practice of the use of language is… wait for it… keep waiting… NOW!

  • J R Fibonacci Hunn In other words, saying that “the past has me trapped” is a creative act. The past is the foundation of all of evolution. Is that a trap? Or, is that a foundation?

    To the one practicing the form of paranoia called shame, anything present is a TRAP. “Watch out! There it is. Oo- there it is again!”

    That is a practice. That is not the past trapping anyone. That is someone practicing obsession.

    Of course, until someone recognizes the linguistic interpretation of “practicing obsession,” then they are trapped in the momentum of the language patterns in which they have been programmed, trained, indoctrinated. They are trapped like a train track with only one track is trapped. If there is a second track splitting off of the single train track, then the train is trapped by not just one track, but two. The train cannot fly in to the air. The train can only go on a track. Patterns in language are the tracks that are available for consciousness to explore. 

    That is either horrible or interesting or trivia. Or maybe all of those.

  • J R Fibonacci Hunn Anyway, Daniel Fritschler, like a dog has no capacity to analyze language patterns, the average human machine is spiritually dead. They do not allow themselves to be manipulated. They are just spiritually dead. The only issue for them is which manipulation or mainpulator will dominate them.

    You, however, are waking up. You can witness your own “manipulating” as well as the reflexive manipulations of the average human machine, as well as the elegant manipulations of mass media and education and religions.

  • J R Fibonacci Hunn As for your last question, the short answer may be “terror.” Social animals form herds and take cues from the rest of the herd.

    Nature is a word for the all-powerful, everpresent, almighty Divinity. One branch of nature includes the earth, which is identifiable as a living organism having many components. One component of the earth would be the entire animal kingdom, then all mammals, all primates, all humans, and all humans who speak a particular language like English.

    Natures rules, including THROUGH human institutions, like the Holy Roman Empire or the Levites who claim global communist totalitarian authority over the entire planet and have for hundreds or thousands of years. They are private assocations that FORM systems of governing.

    Why do humans adhere to the legal systems created by the followers of Noah and Moses? Because Moses ordered the Levites to slaughter their targets, and then the ruling class put on their badges of six-sided stars in a circle, prepared their weapons, and went out and slaughtered their human targets in rituals of human sacrfice, in cold-blooded warfare, in acts of terrorism.

    By slaughtering only a few thousand slaves/ human resources, the efficiency of the system can greatly increase. Millions of other slaves learn about the slaughter and then in terror conform. A few thousand were sacrificed so that the efficiency of the labors of the remaining human resources would rise.

  • Daniel Fritschler Talk about language of the past causing someone paronoia or panic? Were you there? How do you know what anybody did? You J R Fibonacci Hunn are too caught up in fairy tales and heresay that you wouldn’t know the present moment even if you did pull your head out of your ass  . The poppycock or shit talk would be blinding you
    28 minutes ago · Edited · Unlike · 1
  • J R Fibonacci Hunn I am just quoting from what the rulers publish in the Book of Exodus and other texts (especially Hebrew / Zionist texts).
  • Daniel Fritschler Yes but you just got done saying how much the language of one’s past can trap them and then you are saying respect that the language of the past should bring you fear? Why?
  • J R Fibonacci Hunn Maybe it is just a story concocted to bully the masses, but it seems consistent with recent practices of the various militant imperialist religions:|

    In (Exodus 32:26-28), Moses speaks in the name of God (which he frequently does)- in other words, as the LORD, as the “God of Israel” (AKA pharoah or pope) and then commands the thugs of his court system to execute his order as the ruler of the sacred court temple, which is to slaughter the ones ritually labeled as criminals:

    Moses stood in the gate of the camp, and said: ‘Whoso is on the LORD’s side, let him come unto me [to my side].’ And all the sons of Levi gathered themselves together unto him. And he said unto them: ‘Thus saith the LORD, the God of Israel [with Moses as the voice of divinity, speaking with the divine right of kings/dictators]: Put ye every man his sword upon his thigh, and go to and fro from gate to gate throughout the camp, and slay every man his brother, and every man his companion, and every man his neighbour.’ And the sons of Levi did according to the word of Moses; and there fell of the people that day about three thousand men.


    Governments are known to use violence and propaganda. Violence is about producing… [See More by clicking the above link]
  • Daniel Fritschler Yes so to be a god you need to have a group of morons or thugs to scare the other morons…..I get it….Charles Manson was a god to somebody…..James Jones…..Warren Jeffs was also a god…..i can see that….Moses was an authority….the US government is an authority….Gods
  • Daniel Fritschler So like Moses those who were not “criminals” agreed with him and that is why he referred to himself as god…..the way and the truth and the life goes through me Moses and Butthead huh huh you know the gods of the planet Beavis huh huh
  • J R Fibonacci Hunn “Trapped” is one way of relating to the past. When a flock of birds begins to panic and take off in to the air, then it is no great loss for another bird or any other critter to notice that the flock has panicked. Are they over-reacting? Maybe. It is no great loss to be conservative just because the other birds are conservative.

    Adrenalin and cortisol have been around for millions of years (according to the popular story) because they apparently contribute to survival and reproduction and so on. It is not the sounds or letters of language that bring fear, but the interpretations. If you can notice the flock of birds panicking, then you can either interpret that accurately or not recognize it as panicking, but just as a bunch of birds that were on the ground now rising in to the air. If you interpret what you observe as panicking, then you can be conservative and wonder what possible predator may be around- unless you know that you are the predator from which the birds are fleeing.…/A-Flock-of-Seagulls…

  • J R Fibonacci Hunn Maybe some thugs are morons, but I do not disrespect them. Some warriors join because of desperation, like they are in a region of Africa where everyone is starving and there are two warring groups that are the only ones with any food or water, so someone picks one of the two groups and joins. In other cases, shame and threat are used to draft soldiers who would not volunteer, like in the case of the US military draft for Vietnam or when naval warriors were “Shanghai’d” which means that they were kidnapped and forced to become a pirate/ naval warrior.
    11 minutes ago · Edited · Like · 1
  • Daniel Fritschler Yes that all seemed to have happened…whether it did or did not should that bring fear? You know what the problem is I have spent a good portion of my life being a sociopath it seems because fear isnt a concept I have had to deal with. Maybe I am emotionally null and void….which is why I can’t understand a lot of things…..I have never been there?
  • Daniel Fritschler I would be willing to bet if their was a gun in my face I would feel fear but all the words and stories in the world, true or not, just don’t do it for me.
  • J R Fibonacci Hunn One can welcome fear and also notice the possible importance of freezing, as in faking to hide the display of fear when one is experiencing fear. If I notice that there is so much fear that I am repressing the display of it, then I can take actions to withdraw from the threat or eliminate the threat or re-asses the threat to make sure it is really dangerous or whatever else is relevant and adaptive.
  • J R Fibonacci Hunn I happen to have had a single experience with someone pointing a gun in my face. They were afraid. I was startled, but by the time I realized what was going on, the threat was already over.
    4 minutes ago · Like · 1
  • Daniel Fritschler What did your comment have to do with my comment? Are you even listening Hunn……don’t tell me all the clown behavior has you misled?

  • Daniel Fritschler Wow yes I have avoided such incidents

  • J R Fibonacci Hunn Avoided? I did not invite it. It simply developed.
    2 minutes ago · Edited · Like · 1
  • Daniel Fritschler Oops yes it has avoided me….good point. Smart ass ::P
  • J R Fibonacci Hunn In my experience, the imperialist navies have avoided me. I think they heard about what happened in that case where someone put a loaded gun right up close to my forehead and they were terrified by the language of that story, so now they stay away from me. They are just being conservative.


Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: